<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>COMPLIANCEBERATER.TEAM</title>
	<atom:link href="https://complianceberater.team/en/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://complianceberater.team/en/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 16:58:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>de</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Judgment of the LAG Lower Saxony of November 11, 2024</title>
		<link>https://complianceberater.team/en/judgment-of-the-lag-lower-saxony-of-november-11-2024/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jürgen Möthrath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://complianceberater.team/judgment-of-the-lag-lower-saxony-of-november-11-2024/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Protection against reprisals under the HinSchG Section 36 of the HinSchG provides for the protection of whistleblowers against reprisals under labor law as an essential part of the protection of whistleblowers. Reprisals include unjustified discriminatory actions or omissions, such as These reprisals are expressly prohibited. The prohibition also applies to the threat and attempt of...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The expiry of the deadline pursuant to Section 46 GWG does not constitute the occurrence of default for an obligor</title>
		<link>https://complianceberater.team/en/the-expiry-of-the-deadline-pursuant-to-section-46-gwg-does-not-constitute-the-occurrence-of-default-for-an-obligor/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jürgen Möthrath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Money laundering]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://complianceberater.team/the-expiry-of-the-deadline-pursuant-to-section-46-gwg-does-not-constitute-the-occurrence-of-default-for-an-obligor/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No automatic default after expiry of the deadline under Section 46 GwG On February 25, 2025, the Higher Regional Court (OLG) of Frankfurt am Main made an important decision on the Money Laundering Act(case no. 10 U 18/24). Here are the main arguments of the ruling: A bank had received two six-figure credit notes to...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
